{"id":549,"date":"2020-08-23T16:54:53","date_gmt":"2020-08-23T14:54:53","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?p=549"},"modified":"2020-10-01T20:33:05","modified_gmt":"2020-10-01T18:33:05","slug":"ala-plastica-the-ideal-spectacle-of-the-global-south","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?p=549","title":{"rendered":"ALA PL\u00c1STICA: the ideal spectacle of the Global South?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>By Maria Rocio Naval<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Introduction &#8211; collaborative art and the benefits of a transcultural perspective; democratic &#8220;critical zones&#8221;: climate activism and its colonial continuities<\/li><li>ALA PLASTICA &#8211; who are they and what do they do? <\/li><li><em>The AA Project<\/em> &#8211; levels of social engagement; collaborative art practice as a site for environmental activism<\/li><li>Comparisons &#8211; <em>Park Fiction<\/em>; <em>Moving Rainbow<\/em><\/li><li>Institutionalisation &#8211; <em>GROUNDWORKS<\/em>, <em>Equation of State<\/em><\/li><li>Conclusion &#8211; issues to consider<\/li><li>Bibliography<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"889\" height=\"627\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/bc62bb_46ea6f57737d428989cc7f8310fa2005.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-559\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/bc62bb_46ea6f57737d428989cc7f8310fa2005.jpg 889w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/bc62bb_46ea6f57737d428989cc7f8310fa2005-300x212.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/bc62bb_46ea6f57737d428989cc7f8310fa2005-768x542.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 889px) 100vw, 889px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 1. Rhizome: Current scope of Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s activity<br>source: Ala Pl\u00e1stica website gallery<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">INTRODUCTION<\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Collaborative art and the benefits of a transcultural perspective<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-container-1 wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container\">\n<p>This visual essay aims to explore Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s use of collaborative practice as a potential model for other artist-environmentalist movements in the Global South. To do so, a critical theory of socially engaged art should be considered, specifically in a global and transcultural context. Grant Kester (professor of Art History at the University of California, San Diego and founding editor of critical journal FIELD) and Monica Juneja (art historian and professor of Global Art History at the University of Heidelberg, Germany) have provided some key points regarding collaborative art practice as a site for experimentation in a social setting and how transcultural aspects can help bear insights to specific socio-political circumstances in certain areas (i.e. colonial continuities and issues of decolonisation) and how that, in turn, influences art production and collaboration\/participation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here is a summary of Kester&#8217;s main arguments from his book &#8220;The One and the Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art in a Global Context&#8221; (Duke University Press, 2011):<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">collaborative art is a mode of ethico-representational engagement<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">works like Park Fiction and the AA Project (by Ala Pl\u00e1stica) exhibit the desire to work through experiences in an experimental manner<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">the definition of art is in constant flux and must therefore depend on the social conditions of local history<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Kester reviews the fluctuations of what can be defined as art by looking at how it has evolved throughout time. He notes that contemporary art for example, its attempt at a destabilisation of power exhibits a paradigm shift, writing: <\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;Art is trapped within the oscillation between challenging the institutional power and being institutionalised.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Juneja further writes in her article &#8220;A very civil idea&#8230;Art History, Transculturation, and World Making &#8211; With and Beyond the Nation&#8221; (Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Kunstgeschichte, 2018) that an ever-evolving art history must:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">examine the specific dynamic between distance and proximity, and pay greater attention to multiple relationalities that unfold beyond the coloniser-colonised divide<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">according to Partha Mitter, direct attention to how actors on these sites (referring to territories) (&#8230;) sought to make its civilisational aspect serve as a critique of colonialism<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In correspondence to Kester&#8217;s idea that collaborative art is a mode of ethico-representational engagement, Juneja makes it a point to say the following about transculturation:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p>&#8220;<em>The idea of world-making needs to be anchored as a perspective with which to shape [art history] where the relationship between &#8216;archive and vision&#8217; is itself an ethical responsibility.<\/em>&#8220;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Democratic &#8220;critical zones&#8221;: environmental activism and its colonial continuities<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>In order to look at Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s artistic approach to collaboration, it would be imperative to branch out beyond the scope of art history and cross into broader disciplines. For this investigatory purpose, we should consider Mihir Sharma\u2019s thoughts on colonial continuities in environmental activism in the Global North as well as Bruno Latour\u2019s philosophies on humans and their relation to the environment to recognise the principal contexts in which Ala Pl\u00e1stica works.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Mihir Sharma is a writer and academic who offers lectures on climate activism in the Global North and explores this phenomenon as a method of decolonisation that, paradoxically, has difficulty fully addressing its euro-centrism. However, he notes that key elements remain the same for climate movements in both the Global North and the Global South: where (a) climate change and justice is a social issue and that (b) environmental movements must be based on community involvement in addition to individual motivation. To support this, I have compiled a summary of Sharma\u2019s positions on the decolonisation of climate activism in the Global North in a list of bullet points:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">What is meant by environmental activism as a method of decolonisation -&gt; aspiration toward programme of reparations, oriented toward present-future politics using past actions (including effects of colonialism and its continuities) as reason, involvement of international relations in solving a global problem<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">There is an attempt at the development of anti-colonial thinking in Western environmental movements through collaborative projects and collective reflection<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">Activism is a movement generated for the community, rather than the individual<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">The idea of &#8220;climate justice&#8221; is brought forth by a culmination of dialectics where it is posed as a social issue, where the fight against capitalism, racism, etc. is imperative to achieving climate goals<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>When it comes to Ala Pl\u00e1stica, an artist-environmentalist group based in Argentina, their approach to &#8220;anti-colonial thinking&#8221; encourages a holistic transcultural world-view in climate discussions by offering collective reflection. Ala Pl\u00e1stica achieves their approach through collaborative artistic intervention. However, with collaboration and inter-human relations comes a question of democracy and how that connects to our perception of a physical earth\/environment. Latour, for example, talks about the Anthropocene in terms of human engagement with nature and explores its democratic character, thereby implicating non-human entities as being influenced by inter-human politics (another topic heavily discussed in socially engaged art theory).  His arguments are summarised in the following bullet points:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">There has been a &#8220;breech&#8221; between politics on globalisation (of nature): the essential link between conservative revolution and its denial of the new climate regime leads to disorientation and issues of identification, in which territories affect democracy and vice versa.<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">The &#8220;Terrestrial&#8221; serves as a visualisation of terrain where politics is being exerted and can be defined as a democratic critical zone.<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">Art exists as an exploration of connections and relations between humans and non-humans. A historical example of art being used as a medium of exploration of human control over non-human entities is <em>Leviathan<\/em> by Thomas Hobbes.<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"642\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-642x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-561\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-642x1024.jpg 642w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-188x300.jpg 188w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-768x1225.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-963x1536.jpg 963w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-1284x2048.jpg 1284w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Leviathan_by_Thomas_Hobbes-scaled.jpg 1605w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 642px) 100vw, 642px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 2. The frontispiece of the book\u00a0<em><a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Leviathan_(book)\">Leviathan<\/a><\/em>\u00a0by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Thomas_Hobbes\">Thomas Hobbes<\/a>; engraving by\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Abraham_Bosse\">Abraham Bosse<\/a><br>source: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.loc.gov\/exhibits\/world\/world-object.html\">Wikimedia Commons<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Issues of control, as exemplified by Latour, exhibit interesting parallels to the discourse about artist\/collaborator\/participant control in socially engaged art. How that ties in with democratic aspects that extend beyond the spectrum of human politics is fundamentally explored in Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s &#8220;rhizomes&#8221; (Fig. 1.) as a visual map of  what Latour calls &#8220;critical zones&#8221;.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">ALA PL\u00c1STICA<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4>Who are they and what do they do?<\/h4>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;Ala Pl\u00e1stica is an art and environmental organization based in R\u00edo de la Plata, Argentina that works on the rhizomatic linking of ecological, social, and artistic methodology, combining direct interventions and defined concepts to a parallel universe without giving up the symbolic potential of art.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><cite>Ala Pl\u00e1stica website<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>This is a quote taken directly from <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/alaplastica.wixsite.com\/alaplastica\/about\" target=\"_blank\">Ala Plastica\u2019s website<\/a> explaining in the broadest sense what they do and the intentions of their projects. They claim to enact socio-ecologlical change in an artistic and experimental manner. In order to underline their standing in contemporary socially engaged art, I have dissected their artist statement in the form of a diagramme:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"419\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5-1024x419.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-580\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5-1024x419.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5-300x123.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5-768x314.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5-1536x628.png 1536w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide5.png 1868w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 3. Diagrammed analysis of Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s statement, created by the author<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>I connected their terms with ideas from pioneering texts regarding socially engaged art. In this statement, Ala Pl\u00e1stica describes how they use direct interventions as their art-making method. Their long-term investment in space (specifically the R\u00edo de la Plata region in <em>the AA Project<\/em>) can be classified as &#8220;strategic manipulation&#8221;, achieved through the participation of Argentine locals. Additionally, Nato Thompson writes in his 2011 book &#8220;Living as Form&#8221; that the cultural and symbolic manipulation accompanying activism is similar to what can be seen in modern art. Taking in mind defined concepts allows Ala Pl\u00e1stica to adhere to the aesthetic responsibilities and principles of socially engaged art practices. Nicolas Bourriaud opened the discussion about relational aesthetics in 2002 referring to Situationist International as the pioneers of relational art in the 1960s by creating &#8220;constructed situations&#8221; or &#8220;simulated microtopias&#8221; that exhibit central themes of togetherness. This can be seen in Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s statement, as they refer to a &#8220;parallel universe&#8221;, which alludes to a symbolic &#8220;togetherness&#8221; in order to create a vision for the Argentinian community. The group is experimental, another characteristic of relational art, and their work is in perpetual flux. Their work acts to produce a catalyst of &#8220;organic objectivity shifts&#8221; with sustained interventions. How exactly this constitutes to aestheticism or how the symbolic potential of art is actually achieved through their work remains unclear with this statement alone, therefore I have diagrammed another statement of Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s concerning their artistic process:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;Utilizing dialogue and communication as a primary means, we have created unconventional artworks (&#8230;), and stimulated collective experiences to empower individuals to have a wider field of influence in their own political and biological environment.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><cite>Ala Pl\u00e1stica website<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>With the aforementioned quote in particular, Ala Pl\u00e1stica zooms in on <em>how<\/em> they keep the symbolic potential of art (as per the last quote) and their intentions behind their artistic practice.  I have dissected this quote in conjunction with their initial statement and established definitions of socially engaged art.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"385\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6-1024x385.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-581\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6-1024x385.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6-300x113.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6-768x289.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6-1536x578.png 1536w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide6.png 1736w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 4. Diagrammed analysis of Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s mode of work in relation to their artistic statement, created by the author<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>As Ala Pl\u00e1stica establishes dialogue and communication as inherent to the participation process of their projects, they give agency to their participants, ultimately embracing the idea of co-existence as a means to create. In pairing this with direct interventions and defined artistic concepts, they stimulate collective experience in a constructed\/simulated situation, which, according to Thompson, is an act of strategic manipulation, and in my interpretation, is what Ala Pl\u00e1stica means by creating a &#8220;parallel universe&#8221;. Participatory art can &#8212; according to Claire Bishop in &#8220;Participation and Spectacle &#8212; Where are we now?&#8221; &#8212; communicate on two levels, namely to the participants and to the spectators. However, there must be a mediating third term that allows this very communication to take place &#8212; this we call the &#8220;spectacle&#8221; and define as the &#8220;permission of the experience to have a purchase on the public imaginary&#8221;. In this sense, we can see how Ala Pl\u00e1stica&#8217;s use of spectacle is grounded in the empowerment of their participants, which then clarifies what Ala Pl\u00e1stica views as the symbolic potential of art and how this is a component to their collaborative process.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">THE AA PROJECT<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-vimeo aligncenter wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-vimeo wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"AA Project\" src=\"https:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/45389234?dnt=1&amp;app_id=122963\" width=\"500\" height=\"333\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><figcaption>Fig. 5. Film accompanying the <em>AA Project<\/em> installation at the 2005 <em>GROUNDWORKS<\/em> Exhibition<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The video above accompanied Ala Plastica\u2019s installation in the exhibition <em>GROUNDWORKS<\/em> in 2005. It was not specifically made for the site-specific <em>AA Project<\/em> in the R\u00edo de la Plata region, but to showcase the project in an institutionalised gallery space as visual evidence of their work in Argentina. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Levels of social engagement<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"724\" height=\"1024\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-724x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-578\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-724x1024.jpg 724w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-212x300.jpg 212w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-768x1086.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-1086x1536.jpg 1086w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-1448x2048.jpg 1448w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Arte-Util-AA-Project-scaled.jpg 1810w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 6. <em>AA Project<\/em> archived by Arte \u00datil<br>source: <a href=\"https:\/\/museumarteutil.net\/projects\/aa-project\/\">https:\/\/museumarteutil.net\/projects\/aa-project\/<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Above is an archived description of the <em>AA Project<\/em> by Arte \u00datil. Here, I investigate the levels of social engagement in the artwork in correlation with Bishop\u2019s arguments on democratic socially engaged art and Latour\u2019s own views on art in the Anthropocene. I want to make a suggestion apropos the archived description &#8212; that in support of Latour\u2019s description of critical zones, the models of democracy in society are reflected in art. Bishop previously refuted the idea while looking at <a href=\"https:\/\/museumarteutil.net\/projects\/please-love-austria\/\">Christoph Schlingensief\u2019s <em>Please Love Austria<\/em> (2000)<\/a> and the Ladder of Participation, which is a suggested gauge for measuring the efficacy of collaborative artistic practice, wherein forms of citizen involvement and the degree of participation determine the overall value of a collaborative artwork. In <em>Please Love Austria<\/em>, for example, Bishop criticises this form of criteria by proving the work&#8217;s model of &#8220;undemocratic&#8221; behaviour of its participants corresponds to true democracy in Austria. She further notes it falls short of corresponding to artistic gestures, further stating that &#8220;models of democracy in art do not have an intrinsic relationship to models of democracy in society&#8221;.  However, I noticed, that even though models of democracy in society and in art have their own complexities, it could be fallacious to completely alienate the two. As exhibited in the <em>AA Project<\/em>, both models of democracy are essential, and citizen control, as per the Ladder of Participation, is seen as the ultimate goal. For example, as written in the archive by Arte \u00datil, the beneficial outcomes include the generation of effective alternatives to the Argentinian government&#8217;s proposal of the The South American Regional Infrastructure Integration Project (IIRSA), giving power to the locals to reclaim control over their territory. Ultimately, Ala Pl\u00e1stica was able to incorporate models of democracy in society into the <em>AA Project <\/em>and make them parallel to &#8212; and not conflicting with &#8212; models of democracy in art.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"604\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide8-1024x604.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-584\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide8-1024x604.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide8-300x177.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide8-768x453.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide8.png 1359w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 7. Ladder of Participation, diagrammed created by the author<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>With reference to previous positions on collaborative art provided the introduction, Kester reflects on levels of engagement while Juneja&#8217;s arguments have a direct correlation to Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s <em>AA Project<\/em> if we decide to apply her statements in that context. Recording \u201cart history\u201d in terms of \u201carchive and vision\u201d is somewhat analogous to the <em>AA Project<\/em>\u2019s mapping procedure in the sense that data collection from locals was able to create a holistic visualisation of the R\u00edo de la Plata region, which can translate to Juneja\u2019s arguments about how art history can also benefit from a more holistic (global) approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Collaborative art practice as a site for environmental activism<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-container-3 wp-block-gallery-2 wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-2 is-cropped\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"667\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ChicasPonton-1024x667-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"567\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=567\" class=\"wp-image-567\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ChicasPonton-1024x667-1.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ChicasPonton-1024x667-1-300x195.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/ChicasPonton-1024x667-1-768x500.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"705\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/TanquesAzules-1024x705-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"568\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/TanquesAzules-1024x705-1.jpg\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=568\" class=\"wp-image-568\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/TanquesAzules-1024x705-1.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/TanquesAzules-1024x705-1-300x207.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/TanquesAzules-1024x705-1-768x529.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figs. 8-9. Arte \u00d9til archive of AA Project<br>source: Arte \u00d9til archives<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8221; [The AA Project] mobilised new modes &nbsp;of collective action and creativity in order to challenge the political and economic interests behind large-scale development of the region.&#8221; <\/em><\/p><cite>Grant H. Kester, <em>The One and The Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art In A Global Context<\/em><\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Kester uses the <em>AA Project<\/em> in his 2011 book as a case study and writes about their project as an act of resistance against the Zarate-Brazo Largo rail complex, which was considered a threat to fishing and tourist economies, social services, and local employment. However, after researching more about the project itself, the <em>AA Project<\/em> is just one of many by Ala Pl\u00e1stica to counteract the proposed IIRSA, its roots tracing back to Spanish and Portuguese colonisation and the denomination of South American territories as a &#8220;global factory&#8221;. So, while in essence the <em>AA Project<\/em> had been established to specifically advocate against the rail complex, the entire body of work of Ala Pl\u00e1stica tackles the grander scheme of the IIRSA. Alejandro Meitin, one of the founders of Ala Pl\u00e1stica, wrote an <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/hemisphericinstitute.org\/en\/emisferica-62\/6-2-essays\/urbanismo-critico-intervencion-bioregional-y-especies-emergentes.html\" target=\"_blank\">essay for the Hemispheric Institute entitled &#8220;Urbanismo cr\u00edtico, intervenci\u00f3n bioregional y especies emergentes&#8221;<\/a> that, according to the abstract,<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;explores transdisciplinary strategies of critical urbanism that integrate artistic modes of thought and action to create contexts of resistance and transform reality.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>In the essay, Meitin explains their motives for their projects, writing that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em> &#8220;In reality IIRSA is an accumulation and coordination of a great diversity of projects that already existed and now they are given a framework of regional vision that subordinates their social objectives to the logic of competitiveness. It is particularly surprising that most of the initiatives proposed by the new governments are the same, especially in Brazil and Argentina, as those that the neoliberal governments of the last decade of the 20th century attempted to implement and that their peoples in one way or another managed to stop or hinder through a broad debate generated and built from the communities and regions with strong activism from many civil society organizations in our regions.<\/em><\/p><cite>translated from the original<\/cite><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>According to Guy Debord (as mentioned by Bishop), a spectacle is &#8220;participation [rehumanising] a society rendered numb and fragmented by the repressive instrumentality of capitalist production.&#8221; We can relate Debord&#8217;s statement to the efforts of Ala Pl\u00e1stica by looking at the <em>AA Project<\/em> as symptomatic of a resistance against colonialist expansion and degradation of territory. However, is the acknowledgement of the project&#8217;s aesthetic value detrimental to its activist character? For that, we need to look at a few comparisons and the issue of institutionalisation of such artist\/activist projects, which we will do so in the next chapters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\"><strong>COMPARISONS<\/strong><\/span><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Levels of social engagement and activism can very well depend on local socio-political climates. For example, there is a disparity between regions in the Global South and the Global North, which results in differing methods of interventions and collaborative practices. This is one of the multiple reasons I hope to explore Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s use of collaborative practice as a potential model for other artist-environmentalist movements in the Global South, as established regimes and their relationship to such practices differ between the two hemispheres. Therefore, I would like to compare the execution of the <em>AA Project<\/em> to projects in the Global North and South, for which I have chosen to look at<em> <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/park-fiction.net\" target=\"_blank\">Park Fiction<\/a> <\/em>(Germany) and<em> <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.threeshadows.cn\/exhibitions\/40\/overview\/\" target=\"_blank\">Moving Rainbow<\/a><\/em> (China, Tibet) respectively.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Park Fiction<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"449\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11-1024x449.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-582\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11-1024x449.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11-300x131.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11-768x337.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11-1536x673.png 1536w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide11.png 1894w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 10. Venn-Diagramme comparison between <em>AA Project<\/em> and <em>Park Fiction,<\/em> created by the author. Park Fiction image source: Park Fiction official website<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>At first glance, the <em>AA Project<\/em> (Global South) and <em>Park Fiction<\/em> (Global North) seem to have executed their respective projects in a similar fashion &#8212; the main difference lies in the importance of \u201cterrain\u201d in the <em>AA Project<\/em> and its role in local infrastructure. The methods of production, I could claim for example, are essentially identical, however the contexts in which these projects were conceived possess ever-so-slightly distinct concerns. Let me elaborate: both projects rely on the creation and maintenance by activist groups\/NGOs\/local residents along with credited artists, which is very self-explanatory for collaborative work. In both projects, there is direct territorial intervention as a reaction against capitalist\/neo-liberal interventions in their respective localities. Ala Pl\u00e1stica affiliates their interventions with theories of territory and large-scale capitalist expansion (i.e. the Zarate-Brazo Largo rail complex and the IIRSA), while<em> Park Fiction<\/em> works against urban planning processes implemented locally (i.e. the city&#8217;s intention to build high-rise structures on the lot). Both projects use communicative platforms to achieve their artistic goals, and rely on participants to contribute to the infrastructural outcomes of their projects. Ala Pl\u00e1stica used mapping procedures to archive visions and memories of the locals as well as record traditions of cultural significance to incorporate into their programmes. <em>Park Fiction<\/em> had what they called a &#8220;Parallel Planning Process&#8221; in the form of a board game to attract residents of the area to engage in creating a blueprint for what is now known as the Gezi Park in Hamburg.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-container-5 wp-block-gallery-4 wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-3 is-cropped\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"571\" class=\"wp-image-571\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege-300x169.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege-1536x864.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/0010Pudelverfuege.jpg 2000w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"800\" height=\"277\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/11spiel1-800x277-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"572\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=572\" class=\"wp-image-572\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/11spiel1-800x277-1.jpg 800w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/11spiel1-800x277-1-300x104.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/11spiel1-800x277-1-768x266.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 800px) 100vw, 800px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"639\" height=\"359\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/319.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"573\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/319.jpg\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=573\" class=\"wp-image-573\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/319.jpg 639w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/319-300x169.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 639px) 100vw, 639px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figs. 11-13. l-r: Incorporations of <em>Park Fiction<\/em>&#8216;s Parallel Planning Process and its end result. source: Park Fiction website introduction<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Moving Rainbow<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"1024\" height=\"448\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12-1024x448.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-583\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12-1024x448.png 1024w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12-300x131.png 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12-768x336.png 768w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12-1536x672.png 1536w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Slide12.png 1899w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><figcaption>Fig. 14. Venn-Diagramme comparison between <em>AA Project<\/em> and <em>Moving Rainbow,<\/em> created by the author. Moving Rainbow image source: <a href=\"http:\/\/artcritical.com\/goodman\/images\/Xiong-Wenyun-2.jpg\">http:\/\/artcritical.com\/goodman\/images\/Xiong-Wenyun-2.jpg<\/a><\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>In Fig. 14, for example, the contexts of <em>AA Project<\/em> and <em>Moving Rainbow<\/em> are seen as virtually the same. Both projects from the Global South emphasise human-nature relations and the importance of natural landscape, yet the execution of the following projects are different. An important aspect of both projects is the incorporation of local cultural tradition: <em>AA Project<\/em> and willow cultivation, <em>Moving Rainbow<\/em> and the colours of Tibet &#8212; this enhances the importance of participation and gives the locals a valuable role in contributing to the intervention. This approach is more personal compared to <em>Park Fiction<\/em> and embraces specific unifying aspects of their respective communities. Here, the participants directly affected in these critical zones engage in united labour as a reaction against &#8220;industrial colonisation&#8221;, and are provided opportunities for better livelihood conditions (i.e. better infrastructures in the R\u00edo de la Plata region, and more durable work equipment for truck drivers) as a result. Their forms of united labour, however, differ in terms of the timeframes of intervention. Xiong Wenyun&#8217;s intervention was temporary, and was only achieved while the trucks drove through mountainous highways, exhibiting, how Thompson calls it, a &#8220;tactical spectacle&#8221; that does not directly provoke the government. In other words, Xiong Wenyun might have found a loophole in releasing a statement against China&#8217;s trade dominance and environmental exploitation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-container-7 wp-block-gallery-6 wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-3 is-cropped\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"660\" height=\"660\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-damala-mountain-motorcade-no.1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"575\" class=\"wp-image-575\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-damala-mountain-motorcade-no.1.jpg 660w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-damala-mountain-motorcade-no.1-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-damala-mountain-motorcade-no.1-150x150.jpg 150w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 660px) 100vw, 660px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"900\" height=\"650\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-golmud-nanshankou-motorcade-no.1jpg.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"576\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=576\" class=\"wp-image-576\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-golmud-nanshankou-motorcade-no.1jpg.jpg 900w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-golmud-nanshankou-motorcade-no.1jpg-300x217.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/1-golmud-nanshankou-motorcade-no.1jpg-768x555.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"900\" height=\"650\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/2-xuejila-mountain-motorcade-no.2.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"577\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/2-xuejila-mountain-motorcade-no.2.jpg\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=577\" class=\"wp-image-577\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/2-xuejila-mountain-motorcade-no.2.jpg 900w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/2-xuejila-mountain-motorcade-no.2-300x217.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/2-xuejila-mountain-motorcade-no.2-768x555.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 900px) 100vw, 900px\" \/><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">Figs. 15-17. Ten Years of Moving Rainbow: Photography by Xiong Wenyun<br>source: Three Shadows Photography Art Centre<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">INSTITUTIONALISATION<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Groundworks<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-container-9 wp-block-gallery-8 wp-block-gallery aligncenter columns-2 is-cropped\"><ul class=\"blocks-gallery-grid\"><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"550\" height=\"412\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Park_Fiction-1-1.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"565\" class=\"wp-image-565\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Park_Fiction-1-1.jpg 550w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Park_Fiction-1-1-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Fig. 17. Park Fiction at the Groundworks exhibition, 2005<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><li class=\"blocks-gallery-item\"><figure><img loading=\"lazy\" width=\"550\" height=\"413\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ala_Plastica-19.jpg\" alt=\"\" data-id=\"566\" data-full-url=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ala_Plastica-19.jpg\" data-link=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/?attachment_id=566\" class=\"wp-image-566\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ala_Plastica-19.jpg 550w, https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/08\/Ala_Plastica-19-300x225.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 550px) 100vw, 550px\" \/><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-item__caption\">Fig. 18. Ala Pl\u00e1stica at the Groundworks exhibition, 2005<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/li><\/ul><figcaption class=\"blocks-gallery-caption\">GROUNDWORKS: Environmental Collaboration in Contemporary Art, organized by the Regina Gouger Miller Gallery at Carnegie Mellon. October 2005.<br>source: Groundworks website gallery<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>I chose to explore the 2005 <em>GROUNDWORKS <\/em>exhibition organised by Grant H. Kester because I want to look at Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s scale of activism in artmaking by investigating its institutionalisation. As mentioned by Kester in the introduction to my essay, \u201cart is trapped in the oscillation between challenging the institutional power and being institutionalised\u201d while arguing the destabisilation of power as a paradigm shift in contemporary art. Both the <em>AA Project<\/em> and <em>Park Fiction<\/em> were featured in the <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/groundworks.collinsandgoto.com\" target=\"_blank\"><em>GROUNDWORKS<\/em> exhibition of 2005<\/a>. To do that, they transformed their site-specific projects into installations. The works, as evidenced in the pictures above, had been curated to be situated next to each other in the exhibition, further hinting at their similarities. Interestingly, Bishop writes that \u201cactivist art sacrifices its aesthetic credibility on the \u2018altar of social change\u2019\u201d. However, Jacques Ranci\u00e8re, as quoted by Bishop, states that shock and disruption are necessary prerequisites for authentic art, and that participation has potential for these types of conflict. Kester also writes that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em> &#8220;(&#8230;) it is the procedure of distanciation and critique that constitutes the essential content of the contemporary aesthetic.&#8221; <\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>Kester implies that contemporary art, in essence, has less to do with stylistics and more to do with identification and conflict of power. Before being placed in a gallery, the <em>AA Project<\/em> and <em>Park Fiction<\/em> were projects directly involved with social change, as well as having aesthetic credibility (we can argue this through the ideas of Ranci\u00e8re and Kester). Once something like the <em>AA Project<\/em> or <em>Park Fiction<\/em> or <em>Moving Rainbow<\/em> (for context: it became a series of photographs exhibited numerous times) becomes intsitutionalised and placed in a gallery\/exhibition, does that eliminate its activist character?<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>One last comparison: <em>Equation of State<\/em><\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed-vimeo aligncenter wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-vimeo wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\"><div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"EQUATION OF STATE\" src=\"https:\/\/player.vimeo.com\/video\/415984938?dnt=1&amp;app_id=122963\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"autoplay; fullscreen; picture-in-picture; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\"><\/iframe>\n<\/div><figcaption>Fig. 19. Fig. 5. Film accompanying <em>Equation of State<\/em> by Martha Atienza<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p><em>Equation of State<\/em> by Martha Atienza is an example of a circumstance where institutionalisation is not a risk, but inherent to collaborative art practice. Like Ala Pl\u00e1stica, Martha Atienza of the Philippines filmed and turned her collaborative practice into an installation she presented for the <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.silverlensgalleries.com\/artists\/martha-atienza\/download-catalogue\/equation-of-state-2019\" target=\"_blank\">2019 exhibition <em>Equation of State<\/em><\/a> in Silverlens Galleries, Makati, Philippines. While her work serves as a reaction to the removal of Bantayan Island\u2019s Wilderness status (on top of its struggle over land-use and ownership), Atienza does not create a direct response nor enact direct social change. The intention of the work, like Ranci\u00e8re puts it, is to shock and disrupt. She additionally placed a robotic mangrove installation (as seen in the video above) to call out the mismanagement (by the government) of the mangrove forests that protect Bantayan Island and its residents from natural disasters. The collaboration is not meant to sustain its participants but to relocate and relay regional struggle to the centralised government municipality of Metro Manila. She stages the intervention in the confined white walls of a gallery space in an attempt to protect her work, but also to indirectly challenge environmental politics. Her work interestingly adheres to Bourriaud\u2019s concept of &#8220;togetherness&#8221; by working with residents of Bantayan, chews it, swallows it, and regurgitates it as an outcry to the Philippine government\u2019s handling of environmental issues, adhering to Bishop\u2019s counter-concept of &#8220;antagonism&#8221;. The main difference between the \u201cinstitutionalisation\u201d of the <em>AA Project<\/em> and of <em>Equation of State<\/em>, is that on the one hand, the <em>AA Project<\/em> is set up in <em>GROUNDWORKS<\/em> as a three-dimensional progress report and aims to explain and present their motivations, methodology\/process, and results. <em>Equation of State<\/em>, on the other hand, is both a report of the happenings in Bantayan Island, and a request for the viewer &#8220;to question environmental management and the almost invisible hand of legislation that governs territorial land and waters.&#8221; (Jake Atienza, <em>Equation of State<\/em> catalogue) The <em>AA Project<\/em> is thus a showcase of democracy, while <em>Equation of State<\/em> is a call to it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">CONCLUSION<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Can collaborative art groups like Ala Pl\u00e1stica serve as a model for other artist-environmentalist movements in the Global South?<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>To answer the question I had posed in my introduction, I would like to reflect on Juneja&#8217;s past arguments for using a transcultural perspective, specifically the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">There is an urgency for art that can function as a domain of symbolic actin, as an area of political and creative practices, of affirmative, performative citizenship rather than simply a reactive aesthetic<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">[Transculturation] seeks to avoid an overemphasis on polarities and oppositional structures by paying greater attention to multiple relationalities that unfold beyond the coloniser-colonised divide,<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">HOWEVER: There must be an examination of the specific dynamics between distance and proximity; to then unravel specific issues and conditions of the particular locality, where modernist ideas became a productive site of confrontation and negotiation<\/span><\/li><\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p>In summary, Juneja writes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;A transcultural perspective therefore means that we study a combination of comparison and entanglement. It also means negotiating scales beyond the local and the global to navigate multiple scales, indeed to grapple with scale from the perspective of actors for whom it becomes a mode of self-positioning.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>This provides reason to determine that whether collaborative groups like Ala Pl\u00e1stica can serve as a model for other artist-environmentalist movements in the Global South may still be heavily debated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h4><strong>Issues to consider<\/strong><\/h4>\n\n\n\n<p>As we have noticed in our comparisons, there is a difference in treatment of socially engaged (environmental) art discussions in the Global South (for example vs. the Global North), regarding the following issues:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">Colonial continuities within questions of environment, territory, and the Anthropocene<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">Political limitations; potential effects of the local socio-political climate and its acceptance of public (artistic) confrontation; non-governmental provocation vs. governmental provocation<\/span><\/li><li><span class=\"has-inline-color has-vivid-green-cyan-color\">Antagonism and aesthetic autonomy: is the attempt to separate aesthetics a privileged domain of critique?<\/span><\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p>With these issues in mind, we can conclude that the answer requires a multi-faceted and interdisciplinary approach. The importance of looking at this with respect to the Global North-South divide lies not only within their differing treatments of climate activism to address colonial continuities, but also within the use of environmentalist action as reparation in the Global North (cf. Sharma) versus restoration and reclamation in the Global South. What seems prevalent in the Global South, for example, is the provision of infrastructure and\/or help to the participants. The main difference between participatory works in the Global South and the Global North is the creation of opportunities for their participants with long-term benefits, as well as incorporating elements of culture and tradition. In the Global South, the idea is not to transform but to improve, and Ala Pl\u00e1stica does so and claims to do so in an experimental manner. Nonetheless, their methods might not be as accessible to other groups. In China and the Philippines for example, interventionist methods, whether artistic or not, can be sensitive to the political climate. The current situation in the Philippines for example (to place this argument in a more relevant scope), suggests that interventionist artistic practice can be punishable by law (cf. <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/artasiapacific.com\/News\/PhilippineArtistsResistAntiTerrorLaw\" target=\"_blank\">2020 Anti-Terror Law<\/a>). This would, of course, highlight the &#8220;activist&#8221; nature for certain viewers and spectators, however, issues of reception can, as Bishop argues, threaten its aesthetic credibility. Again the &#8220;model&#8221; issue is brought to the fore, as in some areas Ala Pl\u00e1stica would be difficult to emulate. This is where the &#8220;institutionalisation&#8221; of environmentalist actions can act as a protector of concepts where a long-term investment in space is unattainable. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It is thus my belief, that the characteristics of a true ideal collaborative artistic and environmentalist practice in the Global South would incorporate Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019s regenerative procedures and respect for local tradition to create better livelihoods for their participants, but also Xiong Wenyun\u2019s and Martha Atienza\u2019s tributary approach to artistic institutions as a means of emphasising the aesthetic value of their interventions and thus use a gallery\u2019s walls as &#8220;protection&#8221; from authoritarian vindication. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, as Jason Miller argues in his article &#8220;Activism vs Antagonism: Socially engaged art from Bourriaud to Bishop and beyond&#8221;:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\"><p><em>&#8220;(&#8230;) aesthetic antagonism is the problematic assumption that conscience-raising has not only inherent ethical value, but also an ethical priority that shields the artist from any other form of ethical critique.&#8221;<\/em><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>When considering Miller&#8217;s arguments about aesthetic antagonism, it is incredibly important to note that the institutionalisation of interventionist work must not and should not excuse any artist or artist group from violating ethical values and principles. Artistic provocation, will, and always will, have its moral influences on its spectators. In whatever way the artist chooses to use the privileges of institutionalisation to &#8220;protect&#8221; their work will remain their decision and become, all the same, subject to scrutiny.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3><strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline\">BIBLIOGRAPHY<\/span><\/strong><\/h3>\n\n\n\n<ul><li>Ala Pl\u00e1stica. \u2018Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019, 2016.&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/alaplastica.wixsite.com\/alaplastica\/about\">alaplastica.wixsite.com\/alaplastica\/about<\/a>.&nbsp;<\/li><li>Atienza, Jake.&nbsp;<em>Martha Atienza: Equation of State<\/em>. Makati City: Silverlens, 2020.<\/li><li>Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002. &#8220;Introduction.&#8221; In&nbsp;<em>Relational Aesthetic<\/em>, 11-24. Dijon-Quetigny: Les Presses du R\u00e9el: 2002.<\/li><li>Bishop, Claire. 2004.&nbsp;&#8220;Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics.&#8221;&nbsp;<em>October&nbsp;<\/em>110: 51-79.<\/li><li>\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2012. &#8220;Participation and Spectacle: Where are we now.&#8221; In&nbsp;<em>Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991-2011<\/em>, edited by Nato Thomson, 34-45. New York: The MIT Press.<\/li><li>Coleman, Vera. \u2018Emergent Rhizomes: Posthumanist Environmental Ethics in the Participatory Art of Ala Pl\u00e1stica\u2019.&nbsp;<em>Confluencia<\/em>&nbsp;31, no. 2 (Spring 2016): 85\u201398.<\/li><li>Future Learn. \u2018Case Study: Moving Rainbow\u2019. Online Course, n.d.&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/futurelearn.com\/courses\/socially-engaged-art\/0\/steps\/23853\">futurelearn.com\/courses\/socially-engaged-art\/0\/steps\/23853<\/a>.<\/li><li>Gezi Park Fiction St. Pauli. \u2018Park Fiction &#8211; Introduction in English\u2019, 10 December 2012.&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/park-fiction.net\/park-fiction-introduction-in-english\/\">park-fiction.net\/park-fiction-introduction-in-english\/<\/a>.<\/li><li>Goodman, Jonathan. \u2018Xiong Wenyu: Ten Years of Moving Rainbow\u2019, 31 July 2008.&nbsp;<a href=\"http:\/\/artcitical.com\/2008\/07\/31\/xion-wenyu-ten-years-of-moving-rainbow\/\">artcitical.com\/2008\/07\/31\/xion-wenyu-ten-years-of-moving-rainbow\/<\/a>.<\/li><li>Juneja, Monica. 2018.&nbsp;&#8220;\u2018A very civil idea&#8230;\u2019: Art History, Transculturation, and World Making &#8211; With and beyond the Nation.&#8221;&nbsp;<em>Zeitschrift f\u00fcr Kunstgeschichte&nbsp;<\/em>81: 461\u201385.<\/li><li>\u2014\u2014\u2014. 2020. &#8220;Mikrogeschichten: Die Routen des Transkulturellen Modernismus &#8211; Microhistories: The Routes of Transcultural Modernism.&#8221; In&nbsp;<em>Museum Global: Mikrogeschichten einer ex-zentrischen Moderne &#8211; Mircohistories of an Ex-centric Modernism<\/em>, ed. by Susanne Gaensheimer et al., 37\u201346.<\/li><li>Kester, Grant H. \u2018Collaboration, Art, and Subcultures\u2019.&nbsp;<em>Caderno SESC_Videobrasil<\/em>&nbsp;2 (2006): 10\u201334.<\/li><li>\u2014\u2014\u2014.&nbsp;<em>The One and The Many: Contemporary Collaborative Art In A Global Context<\/em>. Duke University Press, 2011.<\/li><li>Latour, Bruno. \u2018Anthropocene Lecture: Bruno Latour\u2019. Lecture presented at the Anthropocene Lectures, Haus der Kulturen der Welt, 4 May 2018.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.hkw.de\/en\/app\/mediathek\/video\/63344\">https:\/\/www.hkw.de\/en\/app\/mediathek\/video\/63344<\/a>.<\/li><li>Meitin, Alejandro. \u2018Urbanismo Cr\u00edtico, Intervenci\u00f3n Bioregional y Especies Emergentes\u2019.&nbsp;<em>Emisf\u00e9rica<\/em>&nbsp;6, no. 2 (n.d.).&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/hemisphericinstitute.org\/en\/emisferica-62\/6-2-essays\/urbanismo-critico-intervencion-bioregional-y-especies-emergentes.html\">https:\/\/hemisphericinstitute.org\/en\/emisferica-62\/6-2-essays\/urbanismo-critico-intervencion-bioregional-y-especies-emergentes.html<\/a>.<\/li><li>Miller, Jason. 2016. &#8220;Activism vs. Antagonism: Socially Engaged Art from Bourriaud to Bishop and Beyond.&#8221;&nbsp;<em>FIELD: A Journal of Socially Engaged Art Criticism<\/em>&nbsp;3 (Winter): 165-183.<\/li><li>Sharma, Mihir. \u2018An Open Letter on the Unthought Contradictions of Doing Climate Activism\u2019.&nbsp;<em>Stillpoint Magazine<\/em>, 22 May 2020.<\/li><li>\u2014\u2014\u2014. \u2018Decolonizing Climate Activism in the Global North: Whose Crisis?\u2019 Zoom Lecture presented during the lecture series Colonial Continuities: Spotlight On&#8230;, 28 April 2020.<\/li><li>Thompson, Nato. 2012. &#8220;Living as Form.&#8221; In&nbsp;<em>Living as Form: Socially Engaged Art from 1991-2011<\/em>, edited by Nato Thompson, 16-33. New York: The MIT Press.<\/li><\/ul>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By Maria Rocio Naval Introduction &#8211; collaborative art and the benefits of a transcultural perspective; democratic &#8220;critical zones&#8221;: climate activism and its colonial continuities ALA PLASTICA &#8211; who are they and what do they do? The AA Project &#8211; levels of social engagement; collaborative art practice as a site for environmental activism Comparisons &#8211; Park [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":38,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[1],"tags":[19,26,35,24,27,3,30,33,25,36,32,29,23,28,31,22,21,37,20,34],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/38"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=549"}],"version-history":[{"count":40,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":873,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/549\/revisions\/873"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.franziskakoch.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}